Klinischer Erfolg mit dem richtigen Regenerations-Konzept

Die Indikationsmatrix assistiert Ihnen durch eine intelligente Abfrage (in der linken Navigationsleiste) bei der Wahl des richtigen Behandlungskonzepts
Je spezifizierter die klinische Ausgangssituation, umso konkreter die Auswahl der passenden Behandlungskonzept-Kacheln im rechten Bereich. 

Die Matrix beinhaltet  > 150 klinischen Fällen und Videos sowie Handling Tipps und Empfehlungen von führenden Experten.

Expertise

Gern können Sie sich bei Fragen zu Behandlungskonzepten oder empfohlenen Produkten an uns wenden.
product-management@botiss.com

Teil werden

Treten Sie mit uns in Kontakt, um eigene gut dokumentierte klinische Fälle oder Operationsvideos zu veröffentlichen.
product-management@botiss.com

Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area  -  2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva

Initial situation - broken and missing upper right central incisor (UR1). This tooth was removed long time ago and there were signs of bone loss and resorption due to the bone remodelling. Patient was also undergoing orthodontic treatment due to the loss of mesio-distal space.

, Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area  -  2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva

Guided bone regeneration after implant placement using Jason® membrane with good pin stabilisation.

, Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area  -  2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva

Exposed implant threads covered with a thin layer of autogenous bone chips harvested during implant bed preparation.

, Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area  -  2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva

Bone volume augmentation was conducted with maxgraft® (<2 mm mm of 0.5 cc) mixed with cerabone® (0.5- 1.0 mm) 4:1 shaped to create convexity.

, Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area  -  2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva

Stabilisation of Jason® membrane using additional titanium pins.

, Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area  -  2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva

Grafting site was covered by two mucoderm® (15x20mm) used as a soft tissue graft as well as a membrane over Jason® membrane . mucoderm® was stabilised with sutures on each side.

, Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area  -  2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva

Modified sling suture used to stabilise mucoderm® .

, Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area  -  2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva

Wound closure without tension and without having to make extra incisions.

, Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area  -  2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva

Wound closure without tension and without having to make extra incisions.

, Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area  -  2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva

Healing stage 8 weeks after surgery - healing abutment partly exposed. Sutures were removed 2 weeks after implant and bone graft surgery.

, Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area  -  2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva

Healing stage 8 weeks after surgery - healing abutment partly exposed.

, Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area  -  2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva

First impression stage for temporary screw retained implant crown 16 weeks after surgery.

, Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area  -  2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva

Fit of the temporary screw retained implant bridge 18 weeks after implant placement surgery.

, Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area  -  2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva

Gingival zenith and soft tissue contour 5 weeks with the temporary crown.

, Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area  -  2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva

Gingival zenith and soft tissue contour 5 weeks with the temporary crown.

, Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area  -  2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva

Final result 3 months after surgery and 2 weeks after final prosthetic integration.

, Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area  -  2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva

Final result 3 months after surgery and 2 weeks after final prosthetic integration.

, Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area  -  2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva

Smile line and harmonisation of white and pink aesthetic.

, Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area  -  2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva

Smile line and harmonisation of white and pink aesthetic.

, Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area  -  2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva

Two Years follow up