Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area - 2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva

01/20 - Initial situation - broken and missing upper right central incisor (UR1). This tooth was removed long time ago and there were signs of bone loss and resorption due to the bone remodelling. Patient was also undergoing orthodontic treatment due to the loss of mesio-distal space.

Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area - 2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva
02/20 - Guided bone regeneration after implant placement using Jason® membrane with good pin stabilisation.

Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area - 2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva
03/20 - Exposed implant threads covered with a thin layer of autogenous bone chips harvested during implant bed preparation.

Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area - 2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva
04/20 - Bone volume augmentation was conducted with maxgraft® (<2 mm mm of 0.5 cc) mixed with cerabone® (0.5- 1.0 mm) 4:1 shaped to create convexity.

Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area - 2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva
05/20 - Stabilisation of Jason® membrane using additional titanium pins.

Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area - 2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva
06/20 - Grafting site was covered by two mucoderm® (15x20mm) used as a soft tissue graft as well as a membrane over Jason® membrane . mucoderm® was stabilised with sutures on each side.

Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area - 2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva
07/20 - Modified sling suture used to stabilise mucoderm® .

Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area - 2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva
08/20 - Wound closure without tension and without having to make extra incisions.

Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area - 2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva
09/20 - Wound closure without tension and without having to make extra incisions.

Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area - 2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva
10/20 - Healing stage 8 weeks after surgery - healing abutment partly exposed. Sutures were removed 2 weeks after implant and bone graft surgery.

Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area - 2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva
11/20 - Healing stage 8 weeks after surgery - healing abutment partly exposed.

Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area - 2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva
12/20 - First impression stage for temporary screw retained implant crown 16 weeks after surgery.

Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area - 2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva
13/20 - Fit of the temporary screw retained implant bridge 18 weeks after implant placement surgery.

Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area - 2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva
14/20 - Gingival zenith and soft tissue contour 5 weeks with the temporary crown.

Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area - 2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva
15/20 - Gingival zenith and soft tissue contour 5 weeks with the temporary crown.

Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area - 2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva
16/20 - Final result 3 months after surgery and 2 weeks after final prosthetic integration.

Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area - 2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva
17/20 - Final result 3 months after surgery and 2 weeks after final prosthetic integration.

Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area - 2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva
18/20 - Smile line and harmonisation of white and pink aesthetic.

Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area - 2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva
19/20 - Smile line and harmonisation of white and pink aesthetic.

Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area - 2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva
20/20 - Two Years follow up

Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area - 2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva

Ridge preservation with permamem®, maxgraft® granules and autologous bone - Dr. E. Valdimarsson

Baseline clinical situation.

Ridge preservation with maxgraft®, mucoderm® & Jason® membrane - Dr. F. Rojas-Vizcaya

Ridge preservation with maxgraft®, mucoderm® and Jason® membrane - Dr. Fernando Rojas-Vizcaya

Situation before extraction of the teeth

Soft tissue thickening at immediate implant placement and GBR with mucoderm® and maxgraft® - Dr. A. Puisys

Soft tissue thickening at immediate implant placement with GBR - Dr. A. Puisys

Initial clinical situation

GBR using layering technique in aesthetic zone with maxgraft® and cerabone® -Dr. H. Maghaireh and Dr. V. Ivancheva

Initial situation after extraction of tooth 21 after 6 months

Single tooth restoration with maxgraft® cortico - Dr. K. Chmielewski

Augmentation with maxgraft® cortico - Dr. K. Chmielewski

Preparation of a single tooth defect with severely resorbed vestibular wall

Treatment of a fenestration defect using maxgraft® and permamem® - Dr. Y. Kassem

Initial clinical situation.

Full arch GBR using cerabone®, maxgraft® and Jason® membrane with simultaneous implantation of 6 Straumann® implants - Dres. A. Signorio and G. Molina

Full arch GBR using botiss cerabone®, maxgraft® and Jason® membrane with simultaneous implantation of 6 Straumann® implants - Dres. A. Signorio and G. Molina

Initial clinical situation

Reconstruction of a single tooth defect with the shell technique - Dr. Andoni Jones

Initial clinical situation

Excellent aesthetic result of buccal augmentation with mucoderm® and maxgraft® after immediate implant placement - 3-years follow-up - Dr. A. Puišys

Initial situation

Posterior socket preservation using maxgraft® and permamem® - Dr. C. Landsberg & Prof. N. Bichacho

Tooth 16 furcation involvement with gingival marginal recession and large Class 5 filling

Ridge preservation using permamem® and maxgraft® granules - Dr. A. Wöst

Extraction socket with bone wall defect

Socket preservation with permamem® and maxgraft® granules - Dr. P. Di Capua

Situation before tooth extraction

Soft tissue thickening at early implant placement and GBR with mucoderm® and maxgraft® - Dr. A. Puisys

Soft tissue thickening at early implant placement-Puisys

Initial clinical situation

Type II socket defect grafted and repaired in a flapless way using Jason® membrane and maxgraft® cortico-cancellous - Dr. A. Jones

Baseline

Entire papilla preservation technique (EPP) for the regenerative treatment of a severely compromised central incisor - Dr. S. Aslan

EPP for the treatment of a deep intrabony defect

Initial X-ray presenting a very deep intrabony defect of tooth 21

Implant placement and bone augmentation in the aesthetic zone using maxgraft® and permamem® - Dr. A. Puišys

Implant placed in the deficient site. permamem® in place for covering.

Block grafting in the aesthetic zone with maxgraft®, Jason® membrane and cerabone® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva

Initial situation – Treatment plan: Replace the adhesive upper left central incisor bridge with a dental implant

Simultaneous implantation and ridge augmentation using maxgraft® cortico, maxgraft® granules and mucoderm® - Dr. A. Puišys

Occlusal view of attached maxgraft® cortico at the buccal site

Maxillary sinus cyst removal using the Crocodile Technique and subsequent lateral sinus lift - Dres. C. Scognamiglio and A. Perucchi

Maxillary sinus cyst removal using the Crocodile Technique and subsequent lateral sinus lift with cerabone®, maxgraft® and Jason® membrane - Dres. C. Scognamiglio and A. Perucchi

Initial x-ray, tooth 25 compromised and to be extracted

GBR in aesthetic zone with maxgraft® and Jason® membrane - 5 year follow up - Dr. A. Jones

Clinical situation at baseline: Situation after tooth extraction UR1 due to a failed endodontic treatment 3 months previously

Socket augmentation using mucoderm®, maxgraft® and Straumann® Emdogain® - Dr. A. Puišys

Alveolar socket before soft and hard tissue augmentation

Socket preservation with mucoderm® & maxgraft® - Dr. A. Puisys

Pre-operative situation; tooth 21 proved not to be worth preserving

Horizontal/vertical GBR using cerabone®/maxgraft®, Jason® membrane/collprotect® membrane and Ti-mesh - Dr. A. Aziz

Initial clinical situation

Immediate implants in teeth number 12 and 11, with dual zone grafting using maxgraft® granules - Dr. A. Jones

Initial situation

Treatment of a combined horizontal and vertical bone defect in the maxilla with maxgraft® cortico in the allogenic shell technique - Dr. R. Würdinger

Clinical situation

Full bone regeneration in extraction socket augmented with maxgraft® and Jason® membrane – Dr. C. Landsberg

Initial clinical situation: 9 mm pocket depth associated with root fracture

Horizontal GBR using permamem®, cerabone® and maxgraft® granules and soft tissue augmentation with mucoderm® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva

botiss-cerabone-permamem-maxgraft-mucoderm-horizontal-gbr-maghaireh

Initial situation - A young female 34 years old lost her front teeth in an surfing accident and she had a 5 unit bridge supported by her upper left lateral and right canine. The restoration failed and both supporting crowns have exposed and leaking margins.

Simultaneous GBR and implantation using maxgraft® granules and autologous bone - Dr. A. Jones